When a key employee takes, it can burden an employer. That’s one reason the includes a key employee reinstatement exemption that provides less job protection for employees who are among the highest paid 10% of the employees working within 75 miles of their workplace.
Employers sometimes think they can replace key employees who take FMLA leave. Not true. They must show that reinstating the employee would have caused substantial and grievous economic injury to the company.
Recent case: Angie Johnson was one of the highest paid where she worked. She went on FMLA leave and was warned that, as a key employee, she might lose her job.
When she was not reinstated, Johnson sued. But the court said the key employee provision didn’t apply because the employer never claimed any economic harm. (Johnson v. Resources for Human Development, No. 09-3664, ED PA, 2011)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/14140/tally-cost-before-replacing-key-fmla-leave-taker "