The EEOC recently slapped a Pennsylvania steel plant with a sexual harassment lawsuit. The alleged crime? It "condoned sexual harassment" by allowing some employees to post erotic pictures, posters and calendars in the office. (EEOC v. Akers National Roll Co.) A company official failed to respond to complaints because he feared male employees "would get mad." The lesson: Walk around and note any potentially offensive materials.
- Don't let succession planning pave the way for discrimination
- When investigating sexual harassment, consider all the evidence--including nonsexual threats
- Boss's stupid sexist comment may spur lawsuit
- Sexual orientation can be basis for discrimination suit
- Wellness programs: Does your health-risk questionnaire violate the new genetic-bias law?