HR professionals or managers should always discuss performance or behavior problems with employees before disciplining them.
After all, employees often admit their mistakes when confronted directly. And any admissions can be used later to support your disciplinary decision if the employee claims discrimination.
Recent case: Patricia Scott, a field manager for an animal control agency, was fired for on-the-job mistakes. The agency said Scott didn’t arrange to have a captured raccoon tested for rabies and also didn’t properly record the drug used to euthanize the animal.
She sued for race and sex discrimination.
In court, the employer produced a sheriff’s department report that documented her alleged violation of narcotics law. Scott argued that the sheriff’s report was hearsay and should not have been included in the evidence.
But the agency pointed out that before she was fired, Scott had been called into a meeting where she was confronted with the report. During the meeting, she admitted she had not arranged for the testing or tracked the drug. That was enough evidence to prove the agency had legitimate reasons for discharging her. (Scott v. Caddo Parish Commission, No. 10-30703, 5th Cir., 2011)
Final note: If you fear an employee may react angrily to confrontation, talk to your attorney before calling a meeting.
Always have at least two company representatives present during the meeting. That helps prevent he said/she said problems later.
- Even 'nontargets' can sue for hostile environment
- What are the rules? I'm afraid we wrongly denied an employee's FMLA leave request
- St. Pete man claims he was fired for sex harassment complaints
- txtng@wrk can mean no unemployment benefits
- Employee works despite FMLA leave? That's not your fault--nor FMLA interference