The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) protects workers age 40 or older from discrimination based on their age. But winning an ADEA case doesn’t require an employee to prove that the employer gave preferential treatment to someone younger than 40. She just has to show that the favored employee was “substantially” younger than the older employee.
Recent case: Carol Mikulski, who was 56, worked for Bucks County Community College as director of continuing education. When a new position opened up, she applied. The college selected a 47-year-old candidate who did not meet the minimum job posting requirements.
Mikulski suspected age discrimination and sued.
The court concluded that her age claim could go forward because she had been passed over by someone substantially younger. (Mikulski v. Bucks County Community College, No. 11-557, ED PA, 2011)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/13896/age-bias-requires-showing-substantial-age-difference "
- Unequal performance standards shout—not whisper—disability discrimination
- Fired in Fayetteville, former employee alleges racism
- Limit hostile environment liability by getting to the bottom of every harassment complaint
- DITO DITA … Do It To One. Do It To All
- Transferring harasser won't necessarily stop harassment