by Tracey Barbaree and Michelle Leetham, Esqs.
On April 27, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) protects a company’s right to include a class-action waiver in its arbitration agreement even though a state law bars such provisions as unconscionable. In a 5-4 decision, the court ruled, “States cannot require a procedure that is inconsistent with the FAA, even if it is desirable for unrelated reasons.” (AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, No. 09-893, U.S. Supreme Court, 2011)
The case involved a retail consumer transaction, but it could have important implications for employers that use arbitration agreements.
Free cell phones, but …
In 2002, Vincent and Liza Concepcion received free cell phones from AT&T Mobility, but their service contract required them to pay sales tax. The agreement also called for arbitration of all disputes—and specifically ruled out class action.
The Concepcions sued AT&T, cla...(register to read more)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- DCF whistle-blower wins $1 million verdict
- Federal employment law spotlight: FLSA, OSHA, wage discrimination
- Supreme Court to hear important employment law case
- Know the limits of employee free speech—no need to tolerate out-of-line protests