Here’s a warning you should make sure supervisors hear loud and clear: No one inshould ever mention a protected characteristic (such as age, race or gender) while discussing a promotion or hiring decision.
Taken the wrong way, such statements can be viewed by a court as direct evidence of discrimination.
Recent case: Buncombe County government employee Melanie Pitrolo sued the county after she was turned down for a promotion. She wanted to become her agency’s interim director. Pitrolo claimed that during a meeting to discuss the position, her supervisor told her some officials had expressed opposition to her bid to become director on account of her age and gender.
The court said the statement was direct evidence of discrimination—and a jury agreed. (Pitrolo v. County of Buncombe, et al., No. 09-2051, 4th Cir., 2011)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- 10 Secrets to an Effective Performance Review
- Ease pay complaints & turnover by training managers
- Rx for drug testing: A firm policy, legal knowledge
- Suing over tip pools may end in California Supreme Court
- You don't have to ignore harmful effect of absences