Despite tough fiscal times, labor unions are trying to squeeze out the best possible benefits for their members. But when the people of California will pay the bill, unions and government agencies need to provide a cost breakdown to the state Legislature. Otherwise the agreements won’t become law.
Recent case: When the governor’s office and a labor union reached a pact to retroactively raise pension benefits for some union members and reclassify them as “safety members,” the Legislature was supposed to receive a summary of the agreement, plus a cost breakdown. That never happened.
An arbitrator upheld the agreement, but the Court of Appeal of California reversed that decision, concluding the parties hadn’t provided the required information. (CSLEA v. CDPA, No. C061102, Court of Appeal of California, 2011)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Lawsuit: TDCJ demotion wasn't just due to faulty time sheets
- Paid suspensions help cool down disputes
- Justify decisions to thwart retaliation bait & switch
- Make sure not to defame an employee when issuing 'Security bulletin' after termination