But now that a California Superior Court jury in L.A. has ruled, Tapout is on the hook for $3.2 million, including $2.4 million in punitive damages.
The high price resulted from a big mistake on the company’s part: retaliation. After Thomas complained about being shortchanged on pay, the company fired her. That’s when she sued.
Tapout tried to defend the underpayment by saying it offered compensatory time off in lieu of overtime pay. Just one problem there—that’s illegal for private employers under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act.
Note: Even if Thomas’ wage-and-hour claim had been meritless, Tapout sealed its fate by firing her. Retaliation claims often outlive a plaintiff’s original complaint—and juries love to hand out big awards when they believe employees have been wronged.
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Categorize reasons why you impose employee discipline
- Continuation medical coverage and small North Carolina employers
- OSHA ergonomics rules to take effect Jan. 16
- Calling supervisor to complain about alleged racial slur is protected activity