Say one of your employees posts vulgar comments on her Facebook page mocking her boss. Other co-workers see it and add their own comments. You have a policy against such actions, so you can fire her, right?
Not so fast.
In another example of the complex interplay between social media and HR, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) reached a settlement on Feb. 7, 2011, in the closely watched “Facebook Firing” case.
The message for employers: Think twice before you try to restrict or punish employees for trashing their bosses (or the organization) on Facebook or other social networking sites. Employees now have more power to claim that such criticisms are “protected activity” under federal law.
If you’re uncertain about how recent court rulings have affected employer rights, you need the Employer's Practical Legal Guide: Plain Language About Current Employment Law
The controversy began last year when a Connecticut ambulance company fired a worker who complained about her supervisor on Facebook. the employee posted a comment about her boss on her Facebook page: “Love how the company allows a [psychiatric patient] to be a supervisor.” She used several vulgar words to communicate how she felt about her supervisor. Other co-workers joined the online boss-bashing.
The company fired the woman, pointing to its policy that prohibits employees from depicting the company “in any way” on social media sites.
The NLRB stepped in and filed an unfair labor practice complaint against the company. It was the first case in which the NLRB argued that workers’ criticisms on social networking sites are “protected concerted activity.”
Usually, protected concerted activity refers to employee efforts to unionize, but the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) also protects the rights of all workers to discuss the pay, benefits and other conditions of their employment with co-workers and others, even in a nonunion workplace. It doesn’t matter, the NLRB says, whether those discussions occur in-person or online.
Prevent costly, damaging employee lawsuits. Ignorance of recent rulings is no excuse when you're on the witness stand. Arm yourself with the employer-friendly strategies found only in Employer's Practical Legal Guide
The NLRB also alleged that the company maintained overly-broad rules in its employee handbook regarding blogging, Internet posting and communications between employees.
Under the terms of the settlement, the company agreed to revise its electronic communication rules to ensure that they do not improperly restrict employees from discussing their wages, hours and working conditions with co-workers and others while not at work, and that they would not discipline or discharge employees for engaging in such discussions. The employee and company reached a separate, private agreement to settle her unlawful termination complaint.
Translation: Review your social media policies to make sure they only restrict communications about things you can legitimately restrict, like disclosure of confidential information. If your policies are overly broad, you may be liable for interfering with employees’ rights to engage in concerted protected activity in violation of the NLRA.
The Employer’s Practical Legal Guide steers you through the treacherous waters of hiring, firing, appraising and disciplining your employees.
This handy desk reference includes more than 80 checklists and self-audit questionnaires to help you target your company’s weak spots—and correct them before you end up in court. What’s more, the Employer’s Practical Legal Guide is there whenever you need to …
- Prevent costly hiring mistakes.
- Cut unnecessary attorney fees and litigation.
Not sure all your questions will be answered? Scan the Employer’s Practical Legal Guide’s detailed table of contents, and we guarantee you’ll see how to manage your employees with greater confidence.
- Avoid uncertainty about the law.
Get your copy here...
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- 10 Secrets to an Effective Performance Review
- 14 Tips on Business Etiquette
- UCLA, professor charged in lab tech's 2009 death
- Top brass not listening? Scare 'em straight with true stories
- With eye toward defending disability lawsuit, track medical condition before termination
- No changes needed to implement new I-9 regulations