When California enacted a 2004 law requiring employers to grant paid leave for employees to bond with a new child or care for a sick family member, critics predicted it would cost jobs and harm small businesses. A new study says that didn’t happen.
When researchers from UCLA and the Center for Economic and Policy Research asked 253 employers if the law had any effect on staffing levels, hiring practices or business costs, 87% said it hadn’t. In fact, overwhelming majorities said the law had either a positive effect or no noticeable effect on productivity (89%), profitability (91%), turnover (96%) and employee morale (99%).
The California Paidprovides eligible employees up to six weeks of wage replacement leave at 55% of their usual weekly earnings, up to a maximum of $987 per week in 2011.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/13318/study-paid-family-leave-doesnt-kill-jobs "
- Can we require employees to use accrued paid leave instead of FMLA leave?
- Poor performance review and improvement plan alone aren't signs of retaliation
- Does your referral program cause illegal 'Inbreeding'?
- Help trim health costs by reviewing claims error data
- Don't consider pending lawsuits when making hiring decisions