Good news if you use arbitration agreements: They apply to former employees who claim retaliation based on protected activity. The potential result: You’re less likely to wind up defending a lawsuit in federal court.
Recent case: When Lisa McQueen-Starling, who is black, lost her job in a reduction in force, she thought the reason might be discrimination. She tried to sue, but the case went to arbitration, under the terms of an agreement she had signed.
When her former boss didn’t recommend her for another job, McQueen-Starling tried to add a retaliation claim. The arbitrator ruled that her former supervisor didn’t retaliate, but had a legitimate reason for refusing to recommend her.
She tried to take the case to federal court, but the judge said the arbitrator was within the law when he handled the claim in arbitration. (McQueen-Starling v. United Health Group, No. 08-Civ-4885, SD NY, 2011)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/13293/arbitrators-can-decide-post-termination-retaliation "