When drafting performance reviews, every manager aims to be fair and consistent. But research shows that, too often, a concept known as "rater bias” can subtly—and inadvertently—influence a manager's ratings.
This can result in either artificially low or artificially high ratings of employees. Both can discourage employees, hurt morale … and trigger legal liability.
Employees often use performance reviews as ammunition in lawsuits claiming job discrimination based on some "protected” characteristic (race, sex, age, religion or disability status). Courts will pounce on any inconsistent or unrealistic ratings they see in reviews.
Help your employees keep getting better – while keeping out of trouble. Get this interactive training CD — How to Conduct Motivating & Legally Sound Performance Appraisals
Here are the six most common types of bias to be aware of when drafting reviews or other types of feedback:
1. Recency bias
Research shows that managers' reviews typically put more weight on performance and behavior that occurred most recently. If you rely solely on your memory to evaluate performance, you're making the appraisal more difficult than necessary—and less effective.
To avoid this type of bias, institute a simple recording system to document employees' performance and behaviors—both good and bad. This doesn't need to be sophisticated. Simple notes in a folder or regular e-mails into an Outlook folder will do. Include concrete examples of positive and negative actions.
Focus on recent actions only if they represent a significant decline or improvement. But consider everything employees have done during the entire evaluation period.
2. Leniency and strictness bias
For reasons they may not recognize, some managers offer exceptionally high ratings across the board, even for marginal employees. Maybe they want to avoid confrontations with employees.
On the flip side, some managers are excessively strict, refusing to hand out great reviews, even to great employees.
In both cases, overly strict and overly lenient ratings do a disservice to the employee and open the organization to legal trouble.
Periodically review evaluation guidelines. Ask yourself if you have any preconceived notions about handing out the highest and lowest scores. Ask HR or a fellow manager to review your ratings.
3. The 'halo effect'
The halo effect occurs when a manager rates an employee's performance in several areas based on his or her performance in one area.
For example, someone who contributes excellent ideas but performs poorly or average in other duties may receive a good overall evaluation. Or a cocky high performer may receive lower than deserved ratings in several areas because of his attitude. Don't generalize based on performance in one area.
It may be the most important thing managers do: evaluating their people in a way that solves problems and improves performance. But how can you make sure they do it right every time? Follow the easy, step-by-step guidelines in How to Conduct Motivating & Legally Sound Performance Appraisals.
This audio-visual training CD comes complete with printed guides. Ideal for solo or group training.
4. Central tendency bias
This involves managers who tend to rate employees in the middle of evaluation scales—never on either end of the "great” to "poor” scale.
Evaluations work best when managers use all ratings levels, when warranted, to portray strengths and weaknesses.
Remember that most employees perform better in some areas than others. And most departments have poor, average and excellent performers.
5. Compare/contrast bias
Don't base evaluations on comparisons with co-workers.
When you've got a star performer on a team, it's common to want to compare every other player to that person. But it's not fair. Instead, rate each person's performance individually according to the organization's predetermined performance criteria.
6. Length of employment bias
Studies have also demonstrated that some managers dish out reviews due, in part, to the employees' length of employment. The longer the tenure, the better the review. Don't assume that experience automatically equals good performance. Evaluate senior employees as objectively as new hires.
The bottom line: Remember that it's natural for managers to have different personal feelings about each employee—and have preconceived notions about their performance. But your goal is to separate those personal views about employees from their actual performance, and to offer the most objective and consistent feedback possible.
Phrases never to use during performance reviews
"You're wrong." If an employee tries to explain why her job rating should have been higher, don't slap back with a Trump-like, "You're wrong." That will only trigger anger and more confrontation. Instead, turn back to your documented facts of the employee's performance and say, "I know you disagree, but I believe this evaluation accurately reflects your performance."
"You did a great job but ... " Whatever comes after the "but" negates the preceding compliment. Don't directly connect praise with constructive criticism. Instead say, "On the other hand, you can do even better by making these improvements." Then, cite them specifically.
"I understand." This phrase can excuse unacceptable performance or behavior by conveying empathy. Avoid it.
"Your position here is solid as long as you keep up the good work." You may intend such statements to encourage good performance, but they're legally dangerous because they imply an employment contract that a court could find binding. That limits the organization's ability to terminate the person if his or her performance declines.
We know, you simply want to help people improve. That's what How to Conduct Motivating & Legally Sound Performance Appraisals is all about.
In just 60 minutes, this training CD – an interactive slide presentation with audio narration – will make any manager a better employee evaluator, with all the tools you need to give an effective and legally safe appraisal every time. The complete program includes:
- A 28-topic course that helps you focus on what matters most, from establishing expectations to setting the right tone to providing feedback – so your employees stay focused on their appraisals, not on you.
- 3 quick quizzes to amplify and reinforce your learning: expectation goals vs. standards, how to improve ratings documentation and a final overall quiz.
The User's Guide includes 4 helpful documents to make group training easy: an invitation memo, attendance roster, proof of attendance form and certificate of participation. We've thought of every detail, so you can concentrate on making your employees better.
- 3 printed guides – a User's Guide, Discussion Guide and Participant's Guide – to complete and expand upon the training. You get a hard copy, so you can get started right away, with PDFs on the CD so you can print all the copies you ever need.
Get your copy today!
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/13283/block-inadvertent-bias-from-creeping-into-reviews "
- Hiring? The legal risk of falling for great interview skills
- When promotions are on the line, follow your criteria and beware supervisor bias
- California Workers' Compensation Law
- Track managers' deviation from rules to ensure there's no hidden discrimination
- Not all employee online musings are 'protected'