Some employers are especially generous when it comes to allowing employees time off for illness and other needs. Some even pay employees during their leave and allow them to use accumulated leave that extends far beyond 12 weeks. But that doesn’t mean they shouldn’t also tell employees about their.
Recent case: Melvin Jones worked for the city of Atlantic City and was off work for about six months after he was injured in an automobile accident. His time off ended up being covered by accumulated leave or other employer-provided benefits.
Even so, he sued, alleging no one ever told him about hisrights.
Atlantic City admitted as much, but argued that there was no harm because Jones lost nothing.
The court agreed that the city probably violated the FMLA, but since no harm resulted, Jones received no damages. (Jones v. City of Atlantic City, No. 08-2416, DC NJ, 2010)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Beware hasty discipline for FMLA leave-takers
- Intermittent FMLA leave is a pain, but don't deny it for that reason
- Think carefully about how work restrictions will play out following FMLA leave
- Different rules for pre- and post-birth FMLA leave?