Sometimes, it’s possible for an employee to have two employers. That’s often the case when a temporary service provides workers for a client, and both the temp company and the client exercise significant control over how and when the work is performed.
But now there’s a new wrinkle. The Court of Appeal of California has refused to extend this joint-employer concept to a company that handled the details of payroll and workers’ compensation insurance and listed itself as the employer on tax filings and other government forms.
Recent case: John Futrell’s work involves providing freelance security services during the production of television commercials. In 2002, Reactor Films, a production company, engaged Futrell and other temporary workers to work on its commercials. Reactor outsourced the payroll and insurance functions to a company called Payday California.
Payday listed itself as the employer on paystubs, tax filings and o...(register to read more)
- The perils of sex in the corner office
- When technological change means jobs are changing too, document the training you offer
- Institution has last word for state higher-ed whistle-blower
- How should we handle a termination when both the FMLA and short-term disability are in play?
- Can we install in-Plant security cameras without telling employees?