Employees can challenge employment practices based on the disparate impact they have on a protected class. When that class consists of older workers, employers can save themselves by showing that a reasonable factor other than age motivated the policy.
Recent case: When a municipal police department decided to abandon length of service as a qualification for promotion to police captain, the only officers affected were those who were over age 40. That’s because the old promotion criteria specified at least 30 years of service.
A group of older police officers sued, alleging the new policy disparately impacted older officers. Therefore, they said, the new policy was illegal age discrimination.
The disparate impact didn’t matter to the court because the city’s motivating factor was the need to cut costs. The court tossed the officers’ case. (Aldridge, et al., v. Memphis, No. 08-6046, 6th Cir., 2010)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/13164/disparate-impact-not-enough-to-prove-age-discrimination "
- Don't consider pending lawsuits when making hiring decisions
- Be ready to intervene if supervisor who shows bias needs an attitude adjustment
- Hey, boss, you'd better call HR! Warn managers: Don't fix complaints informally
- Changes to California law address harassment motive
- Temp service settles sex harassment case in Butler