Employees can challenge employment practices based on the disparate impact they have on a protected class. When that class consists of older workers, employers can save themselves by showing that a reasonable factor other than age motivated the policy.
Recent case: When a municipal police department decided to abandon length of service as a qualification for promotion to police captain, the only officers affected were those who were over age 40. That’s because the old promotion criteria specified at least 30 years of service.
A group of older police officers sued, alleging the new policy disparately impacted older officers. Therefore, they said, the new policy was illegal age discrimination.
The disparate impact didn’t matter to the court because the city’s motivating factor was the need to cut costs. The court tossed the officers’ case. (Aldridge, et al., v. Memphis, No. 08-6046, 6th Cir., 2010)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Facing layoffs? Avoid laying the groundwork for lawsuits
- Remove bias suspicion: Make firing a group decision
- 6 years is long enough: Are quick dismissals on the way following 7th Circuit's rebuke?
- Whether layoff affects one or 100, use solid business reasons to justify job cuts