A 54-year-old supervisor'sduties were handed to a 48-year-old employee. The supervisor sued under the Age Discrimina-tion in Employment Act. A federal appeals court tossed out the case. Reason: The employee wasn't replaced by a "significantly younger" person. To help other courts decide this issue, the court reviewed more than 60 cases to set a standard on what constitutes a significant age difference: "In the absence of direct evidence that the employer considered age to be significant, an age difference of six years or less between an employee and a replacement is not significant." (Grosjean v. First Energy Corp., No. 02-3361, 6th Cir., 2003)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/1297/age-bias-six-years-or-less-difference-destroys-claim "