When disgruntled employees act as their own lawyers, patience may be your winning strategy — Business Management Daily: Free Reports on Human Resources, Employment Law, Office Management, Office Communication, Office Technology and Small Business Tax Business Management Daily

When disgruntled employees act as their own lawyers, patience may be your winning strategy

Get PDF file

by on
in Employment Law,Firing,Human Resources

A frustrating side effect of the current economic downturn is a sharp increase in litigation. Terminated employees and disappointed applicants tend to sue.

At the same time, fewer law firms are willing to handle employment lawsuits they don’t think they have a good chance of winning.

The result: More and more employees and applicants are filing their own lawsuits and acting as their own attorneys.

Traditionally, courts allow these pro se litigants a great deal of latitude simply because they don’t have legal experience.

All is not lost for patient employers willing to take such cases one step at a time.

If the following case is any indication, courts are getting tired of the additional drag on their dockets and have begun dismissing lawsuits when it becomes clear a pro se litigant has no case.

Recent case: When HSBC Mortgage terminated Baijnath Agiwal, he sued the company and several other entities, alleging a long list of discrimination he had suffered while working there. He handled the litigation himself, just as he had in a previous case, which he lost.

HSBC Mortgage filed court requests for documents and a deposition, which Agiwal ignored. It then asked the court to dismiss the lawsuit. The court agreed, citing Agiwal’s repeated attempts at litigation self-help without an underlying case.

The court said it—and HSBC Mortgage—had rightly run out of patience. (Agiwal v. HSBC Mortgage, No. 09-CV-4795, ED NY, 2010)

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: