Because of a bedrock Constitutional principle, a court has ruled that thedoes not cover state government employees who want to take time off due to their own illness. Based on this decision, state employees can only use to care for others.
Recent case: Daniel Coleman sued, claiming he was fired from his job as procurement director for a state judiciary system the day after he requested FMLA leave to care for himself. Judicial officials said the FMLA doesn’t cover self-care time.
The court agreed. In reaching its conclusion, the court looked at what Congress said when it passed the law. When it came to birth, child care and taking care of others, Congress noted that states had discriminated based on sex in the past and wanted to fix that situation by giving employees time off.
It was a different story with self-care. Since Congress didn’t note any past discrimination based on sex when it came to excused absences for an employee’s own illness, Congress didn’t override a provision in the Constitution that forbids lawsuits against state agencies.
To make a long and complicated legal history short, state agency employees have the right to FMLA leave to care for others, but not themselves. (Coleman v. Maryland Court of Appeals, No. 09-1582, 4th Cir., 2010)
Final note: If you are a state agency, clarify your absence policy so employees understand what the FMLA covers.
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- After brief FMLA leave, can we request a second opinion to make sure worker is ready to return?
- HR legislation in Congress: What's hot, what's not?
- Workers' comp law: How to keep costs, compliance in check
- Don't fear personal liability for some firings