For a while, there was some doubt that outgoing Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger could legally force unionized state employees to accept furloughs ordered to ease California’s budget crisis. Then, shortly after the furloughs were announced, the Legislature passed a revised budget calling forreductions.
Now the California Supreme Court has ruled that the furloughs were legal.
Recent case: Back in late 2008, Schwarzenegger ordered state employees to take time off, essentially reducing their pay by 10%. Unions sued, alleging the move violated their contracts. Then the Legislature retroactively reduced the 2008 budget figures.
The California Supreme Court concluded that even if the governor didn’t have the power to unilaterally change union contracts, the legislation forced him to. (Professional Engineers, et al., v. Schwarzenegger, et al., No. S183411, Supreme Court of California, 2010)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Set separate notice rules for FMLA and regular absences
- Age-bias issues don't stop at the border
- Policies can protect you from liability for employee torts
- Hey, boss, you better call HR! Warn managers against trying to resolve complaints informally