A federal court hearing a sexual harassment case has dismissed the charges against a district manager because individuals aren’t personally liable for Title VII violations.
Recent case: Rasheeda Riley worked for a Foot Locker store. She alleged a store manager sexually harassed her by asking her for sex and to go to movies and dinner. She also said he once touched her buttocks.
After Riley was terminated, she sued Food Locker, the manager who allegedly harassed her and a district manager. The lawsuit named both managers as individual plaintiffs.
The district manager argued he could not be held personally liable for sexual harassment, and the court agreed. Although Title VII defines “employer” to include “agents” acting on behalf of the company, the court said Congress didn’t intend for those “agents” to be personally liable. (Riley v. Foot Locker, No. 3:09-CV-411, ED NC, 2010)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/12752/court-refuses-to-expand-title-vii-liability-to-bosses "
- Supreme Court protects age-related benefits
- Court gives employees more power in age-Bias cases
- Text messages and employee privacy: The Supreme Court weighs in
- No 'Hands-Off' status just because of discrimination complaint
- How to prove work environment isn't hostile: Track every bias, harassment complaint