A federal court has refused to expand the, rejecting an employee’s attempt to force automatic for a serious health condition allegedly caused by her employer.
Recent case: Ellen Quinn settled a sexual harassment claim with her employer. Then she learned that the attorney who represented her harasser was about to become her boss. Once on the job, Quinn said, he tried to make her life miserable. She became so anxious and depressed, she requested FMLA leave. But she wasn’t eligible because she hadn’t worked 1,250 hours in the preceding 12 months.
Undeterred, she sued. Her attorney argued that the FMLA creates a new right for employees whose medical conditions were caused by their employers. That alleged right is automatic leave. However, the court dismissed the case. (Quinn v. St. Louis County, No. 09-1372, DC MN, 2010)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/12708/no-automatic-fmla-leave-for-employer-caused-condition "
- FMLA leave doesn't mean immunity to RIFs
- Giving employee the Sabbath day off: When is it an 'undue hardship'?
- Employers, employees affected as Illinois adopts smoking ban
- 17 Questions to Determine if Workers are Fully Engaged
- Use exit interviews to identify patterns of supervisors' hidden discrimination