Students at top business schools are in an enviable position to negotiate issues central to their careers and personal happiness. They’re bright, well-trained and highly sought after. The process of negotiating their first postgraduate job should be fairly simple, shouldn’t it? Perhaps, yet many recent MBA grads change companies soon after taking their first position.
To understand why newly minted MBAs often take the wrong job, consider the influence of their peers. At one business school, MBA students would meet between classes in a particular lounge. As recruiting season arrived, the most popular topic of conversation became job interviews and offers.
Statements like these were common:
The medical benefits are very good. Everyone seemed really happy during my visit to corporate headquarters. The starting salary is $130,000. Employees have significant control over their work assignments. I got an offer from McKinsey.
Which statements were most likely to spread on the student grapevine? Those that conveyed the most prestige: The starting salary is $130,000 and I got an offer from McKinsey.
No surprise, then, that when weighing job offers, many students base their decision on vivid, high-prestige qualities such as salary or firm reputation, overlooking factors more relevant to their ability to thrive in the new position.
These job-seekers, like all negotiators, are susceptible to “vividness bias”—the tendency to overweight vivid or prestigious attributes of a decision and underweight less flashy issues that will nonetheless profoundly affect them. In doing so, they fall prey to other people’s notions about what they could do or what they should desire. Significant research suggests that negotiators often underweight the attributes of a decision that will have the greatest impact on their personal happiness.
How can you keep vividness from working against you? Here are a few ways to focus your attention in the right direction:
1. Recognize vividness as a potential source of bias. The next time you hear a vivid story, ask yourself whether the data is as relevant as it is vivid.
2. Know what you want before the negotiation begins. Predictably, unprepared negotiators are far more susceptible than their prepared counterparts to the lure of vivid information. Being prepared means knowing what you want and focusing on your goal rather than allowing yourself to be swayed by the manipulations of the other side.
3. Use vividness wisely. When your idea makes sense, and when it’s ethical and socially permissible, consider using vividness to sell your own argument.
In budget meetings, a manager who uses visuals to portray her need for project funding is likely to be more successful than a manager who doesn’t.
When her arguments are compelling and sound, executives use the intuitive impact of vividness not only to make better negotiation decisions for themselves but also to improve others’ ability to do the same.
— Adapted from “What’s Really Relevant? The Role of Vivid Data in Negotiation,” by Max H. Bazerman, Harvard Business School, Negotiation.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/12654/are-you-focused-on-whats-relevant "