Employees who are hurt—or families of those killed on the job—generally must be content with the payments they’re eligible to receive under the New Jersey workers’ compensation law. And employers typically aren’t on the hook for additional damages, since they discharge their duty by paying their workers’ compensation insurance premiums.
There is an exception, however. If an employer knows that a safety hazard exists that will injure or kill an employee and harm results, the harmed parties may go after the employer.
Recent case: Kenneth Van Dunk was seriously injured when, in violation of OSHA regulations, he was told to enter an unsupported trench. The trench collapsed. Van Dunk tried to sue his employer directly.
The court said he could, given that the danger was obvious. (Van Dunk, et al., v. Reckson, et al., No. A-3548-08T2, Superior Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/12585/remind-bosses-ignoring-safety-may-mean-direct-liability "
- Could nonexempts' use of smartphones cause wage-and-hour liability?
- Review your FMLA policy in advance of national survey
- How not to handle a whistle-blower's complaint: Threaten to kill employees who report you
- Who is responsible for temp's claim for workers' comp benefits?
- Make sure firing decision was independent of FMLA status