When an employee alleges that she was treated differently than a member of the opposite sex, that’s a regular sex discrimination claim. But if she says she was treated differently on account of the combination of her sex and some other characteristic, that’s called a “sex-plus” claim.
Employees who sue must show that the employer gave preferential treatment to a member of the opposite sex with the same second characteristic.
Recent case: Christal Fox worked for a nursing home; her husband was the administrator. The day he was fired, she was, too. She sued, alleging she had been terminated because of her sex and marital status.
The court dismissed the case, reasoning that Fox would have to show that a male married to a fired female employee didn’t lose his job when Fox did. (Fox, et al., v. Brown Memorial Home, No. 2:09-CV-915, SD OH, 2010)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/12438/sex-plus-discrimination-claims-hard-to-prove "
- Can we terminate worker to keep domestic violence from spilling over into our workplace?
- Employees in 'unique' jobs can use broad comparisons to show pay bias
- Don't even try to argue slur wasn't offensive
- Can you sue for harassment if no one actually harasses you? 5th Circuit opens the door a crack
- Normal pregnancy difficulties aren't ADA or MHRA disabilities