The Supreme Court may rule on the pay discrimination lawsuit everyone is watching.
Walmart last week asked the High Court to overturn a 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in April that allowed a class-action suit alleging widespread discrimination against women to proceed.
At stake: Potentially $1 billion or more if the case goes forward and a court decides the company illegally discriminated against female employees.
The class of potential plaintiffs includes more than 1.5 million past and current female Walmart employees. It is the largest pay-bias class action ever.
The plaintiffs in the case—Dukes v. Wal-Mart—say lack of training and promotion opportunities mean women who work at Walmart earn 5% to 15% less than male employees.
The issue in Walmart’s appeal isn’t whether the company discriminated, but whether such a large group can band together in a class action.
The Supreme Court will likely decide whether to take the case later this year.
The retail giant is hoping the Supreme Court can break a zero-for-three record in Dukes v. Wal-Mart. Before the 9th Circuit ruling, Walmart had already failed twice in attempts to have the class decertified, once at the district court level and once before a three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit.
Why this case is important: If the Supreme Court rules in the plaintiffs' favor, look for more supersized class-action lawsuits. Remember: While a lawsuit from one employee may cost you a few thousand dollars, a class-action suit on behalf of many employees could result in damages worth millions ... or more.
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Courts say, 'Enough!': Employees must file all related claims at same time
- High court upholds firing lactating worker
- Federal employment bias claims may be subject to grievance arbitration
- Court: Isolated risqué comments aren't enough to create a hostile work environment