Here’s good news for supervisors who are afraid of making the wrong disciplinary decision: Employers don’t have to be right every time about the underlying reasons for disciplinary action. Instead, what counts is acting in good faith.
Recent case: Jorge Ruiz was a mental-health worker who got good reviews and earned a promotion. Shortly after the promotion, a patient accused him of sexual assault and he was suspended with pay, pending an investigation. Ultimately, he was reinstated because the investigator concluded the patient’s allegations weren’t credible.
Later, two co-workers accused Ruiz of sexual harassment. Then he accused them of having inappropriate relationships with patients. Then yet another patient accused Ruiz of raping her. Those charges were also dismissed.
Ruiz was fired, ostensibly because he had failed to report his co-workers’ relationships with patients before they accused him of sexual harassment and because of his history of being accused.
He sued, claiming he had been singled out for termination because he was Hispanic.
The court dismissed his case. It reasoned that while Ruiz might be able to prove that he was fired because his employer falsely believed he had abused patients, that didn’t make the decision to terminate him illegal. An employer can be honestly wrong.
Ruiz wasn’t fired because he was Hispanic, but because his employer thought he was trouble. (Ruiz v. County of Rockland, No. 09-0759, 2nd Cir., 2010)
- Instant response to harassment complaint cuts liability risk
- The legal danger of playing 'peek-a-boo' with job postings
- When identifying sexual harassment, totality of circumstances tells the tale
- Changes to Ohio's pregnancy discrimination rules now in question
- Layoffs: The right way to prepare and execute