Public employees are entitled to due process before they’re fired. But that’s a flexible standard that allows firing for “unacceptable personal conduct.”
Recent case: Edwin Jolly was an information technology worker at the University of North Carolina at Wilmington for 22 years. Then he was fired for engaging in unacceptable personal conduct, something the university manual listed as just cause for dismissal. (Court records don’t list the particular offense.)
Jolly argued that the term was too vague to be constitutional; therefore he had been denied due process.
The court disagreed. Just as the phrase “unbecoming an officer and a gentleman” has been ruled an adequate termination basis for police officers, “unacceptable personal conduct” is fair grounds for dismissal of a North Carolina state employee. (Jolly v. University of North Carolina at Wilmington, No. 7:09-CV-136, ED NC, 2010)
- SOX doesn't protect safety whistle-blowers
- Nonunion shops: You can be liable for 'unfair labor practices'
- N.J. Supreme Court backs former HR exec who copied documents
- You won't be liable for employees' conjecture about discrimination
- Only truly outrageous conduct can add up to intentional infliction of emotional distress