by Arthur B. Smith Jr. and Michael H. Cramer, Esqs.
The U.S. Supreme Court in late May unanimously sided with a group of black firefighter applicants who alleged that the city of Chicago’s employment selection process had a disparate impact on them. The court said the timing of Title VII lawsuits—in this case concerning a pre-employment test—doesn’t depend on when the alleged discriminatory act first occurred, but on when the employer acted on the results of that discriminatory act, even if that’s years later.
The applicants challenged the city’s decision to exclude applicants who did not achieve a certain score on an examination—but not the city’s decision to adopt that employment practice.
The case is Lewis v. City of Chicago (Supreme Court of the United States, No. 08–974, May 24, 2010).
In July 1995, Chicago administered a written examination to more than 26,000 applicants seeking to serve in the Ch...(register to read more)
- Retaliation long after employee complained? Courts skeptical when years pass without incident
- Can telling applicant he's 'overqualified' trigger a lawsuit?
- When service member returns from active duty, reinstate to job that's truly comparable to old one
- Know union rules on probationary employees
- Make sure your arbitration agreement is valid in Ohio