At some point, an unsuccessful job candidate may challenge your decision not to hire him. Then you will have to justify your selection process.
The more objective criteria you use, the more likely a court will agree not to second-guess your decision.
But if you add subjective elements to the process, you may end up being charged with discrimination—especially if a simple glance at the makeup of your workforce reveals an apparent lack of diversity.
Recent case: David Torgerson and Jami Mundell wanted to work as firefighters for the city of Rochester. Torgerson is a member of the Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians. Mundell is a woman.
Both passed an objective, oral skills test. They both had taken the appropriate minimum training in firefighting and passed a challenging physical agility test required of all candidates for firefighter positions. They were placed on the city’s eligibility list.
The next s...(register to read more)
- Beware asking applicants about medical histories before making job offer
- Can we administer a polygraph test to find out if one of our employees has been stealing?
- Does your referral program cause illegal 'Inbreeding'?
- Drug test inconclusive? Offer a second chance
- Oral promise of long-term job will trump written at-will agreement