Under many federal employment laws, employees don’t have to be fired to sue for. Instead, they can claim constructive discharge, alleging they had no choice but to quit.
But that argument won’t fly for employees who try to sue their Illinois employers for common-law wrongful termination.
Recent case: Paula Farlin quit her job with The Library Store, claiming she had no choice but to do so. She had complained about discrimination on behalf of another employee and said her boss allegedly told her she was “through.”
The court said that wasn’t good enough to be taken as a literal discharge, and that constructive discharge doesn’t count as an actual discharge. Therefore, her wrongful termination claim lacked merit. (Farlin v. The Library Store, No. 08-CV-1194, CD IL, 2010)
Final note: This is good news, since damages are unlimited under common-law wrongful termination claims.
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Act fast on firing for misconduct, or risk being liable for unemployment compensation
- Double-check employee ID records! No-match letters are back
- New risk: Workers can claim retaliation even if there's no adverse job action
- Fired for insisting on legal compliance, HR pro will get his day in court