Case in point: A dishwasher at a Virginia hotel was laid off and told he'd be rehired after the hotel's remodeling. But after the reopening, the hotel refused to rehire him, citing its new rule that required all employees to speak fluent English. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) sued the hotel for discrimination because of national origin. The hotel has suspended its fluency policy pending the case's resolution.
Bottom line: Require English fluency only on a case-by-case basis. Follow the EEOC guideline: Require people to speak fluent English at work only if it's needed "for the effective performance of the position." You'll stand on safest ground if you can cite objective business reasons for demanding English fluency, such as safety, effective supervision or communication with customers.
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Résumé-Screening software: legal risks and precautions
- The 'surge home': Welcome service members back to work
- How responsible is a parent company for an action filed against a subsidiary company?
- 'I'm having health problems': 7 steps for handling the interactive conversation