Case in point: A dishwasher at a Virginia hotel was laid off and told he'd be rehired after the hotel's remodeling. But after the reopening, the hotel refused to rehire him, citing its new rule that required all employees to speak fluent English. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) sued the hotel for discrimination because of national origin. The hotel has suspended its fluency policy pending the case's resolution.
Bottom line: Require English fluency only on a case-by-case basis. Follow the EEOC guideline: Require people to speak fluent English at work only if it's needed "for the effective performance of the position." You'll stand on safest ground if you can cite objective business reasons for demanding English fluency, such as safety, effective supervision or communication with customers.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/1170/demand-english-fluency-only-if-its-needed "
- Go ahead and discipline, even when considering FMLA leave
- What's the Minnesota law on confidentiality agreements? Are they enforceable?
- Must we rehire strikers when labor dispute ends? We may want to keep replacement workers
- New arbitration pacts should cover 'Old' job disputes
- Tell bosses: Check anti-military bias at door