In addition to paying damages such as lost wages, employers that lose discrimination cases often have to pay the winning side’s litigation costs. But the same isn’t always true when an employer wins the lawsuit.
Courts are reluctant to make employees pay when they lose, fearing that doing so may dissuade other employees from taking a chance at litigation.
Recent case: When a group of employees with language difficulties had to take a skills test in English, they failed. When they were terminated, they sued, alleging discrimination.
The jury sided with the employer, which then asked the court to order the employees to pay its legal bills.
The court refused, concluding that doing so might have a chilling effect on employee-rights litigation. (Rivera, et al., v. NIBCO, No. 1:99-CV-06443, ED CA, 2010)
- No adverse action needed for hostility case
- Track all disciplinary actions to head off disparate-Treatment claims
- When accused harasser says he was harassed, weigh everyone's credibility--and motive for lying
- Stop harassment lawsuits by requiring bosses to log employees' performance problems
- EEOC sues Mesaba Airlines over Sabbath rules