• LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google+

Don’t cut filing period in arbitration agreement

by on
in Employment Law,Human Resources

California courts are hard on employers that force employees to sign arbitration agreements. Judges often find these agreements unconscionable.

And one of the quickest ways to end up with an unconscionable and invalid agreement is to cut the time an employee has to file a claim.

Recent case:
When Renée Rose began working as an executive secretary at a high-tech firm, she was told she had to sign an arbitration agreement. One of its provisions required her to file any claim covered by the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) within one year of the incident on which the claim was based.

When Rose complained of harassment and retaliation, she challenged the validity of the one-year deadline. The court agreed with her, noting that FEHA has a two-year statute of limitations. (Rose v. Synergenics, No. A125163, Court of Appeal of California, 1st Appellate District, 2010)

Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!

Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...

We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.

The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.

" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/11437/dont-cut-filing-period-in-arbitration-agreement "

Leave a Comment