Simply having an anti-harassment policy isn’t enough. Employers have to use it when faced with a violation. When you do, make sure you document what you did to remedy the problem.
Recent case: The Harcourt Company provided its anti-harassment policy to employees when they were hired, during orientation and again during regular training. When Ashley Funk found sexually explicit graffiti that included her name, she reported it to HR. The graffiti was removed.
Three months later, she claimed a co-worker slapped her, and Funk retaliated with a push. Funk again complained. Harcourt interviewed witnesses, concluded both employees were at fault and suspended them. Funk sued.
The court said it was clear the policy was effectively enforced since the graffiti was removed fast. It also said the employer’s dual punishment was appropriate. (Funk v. Harcourt Company, No. 08-1841, DC NJ, 2009)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/11037/enforce-policy-to-prove-you-dont-tolerate-harassment "
- 'Trans'-cending stereotypes: Tackling transgender bias in the workplace
- Consider uniform, ADEA-compliant severance and rights-waiver releases--even if age isn't factor
- Thorough and confidential investigation is best HR response when harassment strikes
- Ring of fire: Don't get burned by a reference call
- Employee handbooks: Craft with care to secure 'at-will' policy