The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has long been seen as the most liberal federal appeals court—and very employee-friendly. Could that slowly be changing?
The court sided with employers in this recent Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) case.
Recent case: Bruce Anderson worked as a mechanic for most of his life until he injured his knee in a shop accident. Later, he was diagnosed with arthritis and claimed he couldn’t work.
He filed a claim for disability retirement from the Teamsters Union. Plan administrators concluded that Anderson’s disability started later than he claimed, which considerably cut his monthly pay.
He appealed, alleging a conflict of interest, since employers funded the plan and employer representatives participated in decisions. The court rejected the claim, reasoning that employee representatives helped make the decision, too. (Anderson v. Suburban Teamsters, No. 07-15532, 9th Cir., 2009)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/10984/shock-9th-circuit-rules-for-employers-in-erisa-case "