Employers that must decide whom to cut during a reduction in force sometimes mistakenly fear they can’t terminate someone who is out on
Recent case: Susan Kelley was consistently a few minutes late to work. Even after counseling, she continued to arrive late, apparently ignoring her supervisor’s reasonable suggestion that she leave home 10 minutes earlier.
Then Kelley took emergency leave when her father died. Meanwhile, economic problems required her employer to lay off several employees. Kelley was picked because she had the worst attendance record.
She sued for FMLA interference, but the court said the employer did nothing wrong since her tardiness wasn’t related to FMLA leave. (Kelley v. AmerisourceBergen, No. 08-2377, ED PA, 2009)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- FMLA 'stress leave': When must you allow it?
- Request certification at start of each FMLA year
- Congress begins debate on paid-leave bill; Obama OKs same-sex benefits for federal workers
- Altering time sheets can mean personal liability for managers