The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) protects workers age 40 or older from discrimination based on age.
To win an ADEA lawsuit, an employee has to show that a younger employee replaced her. However, that younger employee must be at least six years younger unless there is direct evidence of age discrimination.
Recent case: Melissa Smith-Deaton was fired from her job at an insurance company after she was caught accessing her daughter-in-law’s insurance policy in the computer system. The daughter-in-law had already warned the company she suspected Smith-Deaton might try to change the beneficiary without permission.
Smith-Deaton sued, alleging age discrimination was the real reason for her firing. But her replacement was a mere five years younger—not enough of an age difference to support a lawsuit without direct evidence. (Smith-Deaton v. Western & Southern Financial Group, No. 1:08-CV-505, 2009)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/10342/replacing-worker-with-someone-slightly-younger-isnt-age-bias "
- Firing employees on FMLA leave: Occasionally legal, usually unwise
- When essential duties are at issue, OK to base medical exam on FMLA certification
- As the employer, it's up to you to prove overtime exempt status
- Treat all pregnant employees equally, regardless of race or ethnicity
- Put it in your handbook: Supervisors must never use demeaning language