Lawyers are always looking for new and different reasons to sue employers on behalf of employees and applicants. That’s bad news for employers, because additional charges mean greater legal costs, more lost time and potentially higher jury awards.
Fortunately, courts are growing impatient with this practice, as the following case shows.
Recent case: Former Sears employee Gerard Atchinson sued, claiming he was fired for taking .
His attorneys also said the discharge broke Pennsylvania state law because it violated public policy. Pennsylvania outlaws firing at-will employees if doing so would violate public policy, and Atchinson argued that violating the violates public policy.
The court dismissed the additional claim, concluding that the FMLA has its own remedies built in. Employees must use those. (Atchinson v. Sears, No. 08-3257, ED PA, 2009)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- You can insist on investigation confidentiality
- Expunged convictions set hidden trap for Illinois employers
- Ease strict noncompete pacts or risk wrongful discharge claim
- Firing Guard or Reserve member? Better show you would have taken action despite service