Supervisors who stand up for subordinates when they claim they have been discriminated against may be engaging in “protected activity.” That could make punishing those supervisors retaliation.
Recent case: Adolph Vincent, who is black, had worked for Pacific Gas & Electric for more than 35 years when he agreed to testify on behalf of a black subordinate he believed has been discriminated against. Vincent urged his own supervisor to implement diversity training after another subordinate complained of race discrimination.
PG&E then terminated Vincent, and he sued, alleging retaliation.
The court said the case should go to trial because advocating on behalf of another employee is protected activity. (Vincent v. Pacific Gas & Electric Company, No. 07-5531, ND CA, 2009)
Final note: Suddenly terminating a longtime employee looks suspicious. If you must, carefully document the reasons. Otherwise, a jury may conclude the motive was retaliation.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/10262/testifying-for-subordinate-may-be-protected-activity "
- With eye toward defending disability lawsuit, track medical condition before termination
- Recruiting/Screening Practices
- Defend against retaliation claims: Good records can stop whistle-blower complaints
- Court: Trial for mentally ill worker denied transfer
- Declining to cooperate with investigation isn't protected