Some good news: A federal court has ruled that an employer that mistakenly tells an employee he is covered by the
Recent case: Ronald Kuczynski left his job as president of Lyra and started his own company. Lyra Management sued him, and Kuczynski filed his own lawsuit alleging that he had been denied rights to take .
Lyra said he wasn’t eligible because it didn’t employ more than 50 employees. Kuczynski countered that he had a letter from Lyra saying he was eligible.
The court dismissed the case, concluding the letter didn’t bind Lyra. (Kuczynski v. Lyra Management, No. 08-62067, SD FL, 2009)
Final note: The court noted that the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals hasn’t ruled on the issue yet. That may mean an appeal.
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- 10 Secrets to an Effective Performance Review
- 4 discriminatory hiring practices will lure EEOC to your door
- Independent judgment often key to exempt status
- Retaliation nation: Manage adverse actions to lessen retaliation
- Mere accommodation request may support retaliation claim