Employees who have successfully dealt with drug addiction but don’t have any current or continuing drug problems are not disabled under the ADA.
Recent case: Andre Abron, who worked for a railroad, was caught with cocaine in his system after a random drug test. His employer gave him time off for treatment from the railroad’s .
Once Abron returned to work, he began complaining that co-workers were harassing him by implying that he was either dealing or using drugs.
He sued, alleging that he was the victim of a disability-based hostile work environment.
The court dismissed his case, reasoning that Abron was not disabled under the ADA because he could offer no evidence he had any current addiction-related problems—his past problems didn’t substantially impair any present major life activities. Thus, he couldn’t claim any hostility at work was based on disability. (Abron v. Soo Line Railroad, No. 08-C-1955, ND IL, 2009)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Solidify an independent contractor's status by proving he turned down employee job offer
- Health care reform: California weighs in on essential health benefits
- Some relatives now eligible for unemployment compensation
- Benefits administrator pleads guilty to ERISA embezzlement