Reductions in force are risky, so plan them carefully. Before you try to explain why you’re letting certain employees go, make sure your reasons make sense.
Recent case: Bonnie Marcus and three other employees over age 40 were terminated during a reduction in force. The employer tried to argue that they were picked because the funding for their positions had been pulled from the budget.
They sued, alleging age discrimination, and soon uncovered the fact that younger employees whose salaries came from the same budget line had been retained. Plus, the company rehired several younger employees, but none of the older ones.
The court ordered a jury trial. (Marcus, et al., v. PQ Corporation, No. 07-2075, ED PA 2009)
- Bully boss? At least make sure he's equally disagreeable to all kinds of subordinates
- Minnesota town administrator files human rights complaint
- Poor performer has complained? Read this before firing!
- When it comes to discrimination lawsuits, the clock starts ticking with firing date
- Fire at will: The last straw doesn't have to be the same for all employees