Reductions in force are risky, so plan them carefully. Before you try to explain why you’re letting certain employees go, make sure your reasons make sense.
Recent case: Bonnie Marcus and three other employees over age 40 were terminated during a reduction in force. The employer tried to argue that they were picked because the funding for their positions had been pulled from the budget.
They sued, alleging age discrimination, and soon uncovered the fact that younger employees whose salaries came from the same budget line had been retained. Plus, the company rehired several younger employees, but none of the older ones.
The court ordered a jury trial. (Marcus, et al., v. PQ Corporation, No. 07-2075, ED PA 2009)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Before we start background checks, should we start asking applicants for birth dates?
- Just-departed worker owes us money: Can we dock (or withhold) his final paycheck?
- What are the ramifications of disclosing information during preliminary negotiations?
- Supreme Court expands time to sue over policies with disparate impact