Reductions in force are risky, so plan them carefully. Before you try to explain why you’re letting certain employees go, make sure your reasons make sense.
Recent case: Bonnie Marcus and three other employees over age 40 were terminated during a reduction in force. The employer tried to argue that they were picked because the funding for their positions had been pulled from the budget.
They sued, alleging age discrimination, and soon uncovered the fact that younger employees whose salaries came from the same budget line had been retained. Plus, the company rehired several younger employees, but none of the older ones.
The court ordered a jury trial. (Marcus, et al., v. PQ Corporation, No. 07-2075, ED PA 2009)
- Record $2.5M Race-Discrimination Settlement Highlights New EEOC Crackdown
- It's not bias: Set cutoff date for receiving applications
- Cold response to accommodation request puts firm in hot water
- Execs sue Jays Foods' parent company following bankruptcy
- It's every manager's duty to take harassment complaints